NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application of Vito Zepinic (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 693 Hearing dates: 3 June 2020 Decision date: 03 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Motion to set aside judgment dismissed with indemnity costs; trustee's motions for remuneration, gross sum costs on the indemnity basis with interest and payment out granted Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Parties — Vexatious litigants — Leave to institute proceedings — Whether leave required for notice of motion to set aside judgment refusing leave to institute proceedings — Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), s 13
JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Amending, varying and setting aside — Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Part 36 r 36.16 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Cases Cited: Application of Vito Zepinic [2020] NSWSC 269 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd [2020] NSWSC 408 Grace v Grace (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 1239 Kostov v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 94 Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWCA 72 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Vitomir Zepinic (Plaintiff)
Nicholas Craig Malanos (Defendant)
Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (Third Party) Representation: Counsel:
V Zepinic (in person)
D G Healey and D Blazer (Defendant)
A Loel (Solicitor) (Third Party)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate