NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance v Wannous [2020] NSWSC 694 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 June 2020 Decision date: 09 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) The determination of the Third Defendant on 11 September 2019 that he was not satisfied under s 92(1)(b) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 that the First Defendant's claim was not suitable for assessment be set aside;
(2) There be no order as to the costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – determination of whether claim under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 is exempt from assessment – whether implied duty to provide reasons for declining to exempt claim – nature of body that exercised function – nature of function exercised – whether judicial in nature Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Supreme Court Act 1970 Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 Cases Cited: AAI Ltd v Feng [2019] NSWSC 535 Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353; [1949] HCA 26 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan & Ors (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Houssein v Under Secretary of Industrial Relations and Technology (NSW) (1982) 148 CLR 88; [1982] HCA 2 IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance v Khaled [2019] NSWSC 320 Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance Limited v Milton [2016] NSWSC 1521 Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA v Howard [2019] NSWSC 224 John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503; [2000] HCA 36 Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales v Secretary of the Treasury [2014] NSWCA 112 Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656; [1986] HCA 7 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA (Plaintiff) Bassel Wannous (First Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Second Defendant) Hugh Macken (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Rewell SC (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate