NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ageist Pty Limited v More Than Skin Deep Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 698 Hearing dates: 22 May 2020 Date of orders: 22 May 2020 Decision date: 22 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rees J Decision: Defendants ordered to withdraw caveat. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – Caveats – s 74MA Real Property Act – mortgage required consent of mortgagee before disposing of property – default on loan – notice of default – mortgagor trying to refinance – mortgagor's wife (also finance broker and director of purchaser) assisting with finance – mortgagor signs contract of sale to related parties – sale price above market – deposit not paid – unclear whether agent on contract actually retained – mortgagee not told – contract to support higher value of property for refinance – not bona fide contract of sale – offer of finance – offer not accepted – finance insufficient anyway – power of sale exercised – mortgagee sells at auction – caveat lodged citing earlier contract of sale – whether serious issue to be tried – no evidence purchaser could get finance – balance of convenience favoured removal of caveat Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), ss 57(2), 58(1), 74MA Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 111 Cases Cited: Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1868 Buchanan v Crown & Gleeson Business Finance Pty Ltd (2007) 13 BPR 24,513; [2006] NSWSC 1465 Forsyth v Blundell (1973) 129 CLR 477 Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd v Roberts (2016) 93 NSWLR 1; [2016] NSWCA 240 Inglis v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia [1972] HCA 74; (1972) 126 CLR 161 Pham v Zraika (No 4) [2018] NSWSC 566 Stern v McArthur [1988] HCA 51; (1988) 165 CLR 489 Waring (Lord) v London and Manchester Assuring Co Ltd [1935] Ch 310 Texts Cited: Croft & Hay, The Mortgagee's Power of Sale (3rd ed, 2012, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ageist Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) More Than Skin Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Lupco Stojcevski (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Meyerowitz-Katz (Plaintiff) Mr A Katsoulas (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate