NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rosenbaum v Baidarman [2020] NSWSC 699 Hearing dates: 02 June 2020 Date of orders: 03 June 2020 Decision date: 05 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Williams J Decision: Grant leave to the cross-defendants to make certain uncontested amendments to the Defence to Amended Cross-Claim. Otherwise, leave refused. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications – leave to amend pleadings – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56–58, 64 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 20.14 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Eduard Rosenbaum (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Ironwell Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant)) Jacob Baidarman (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Alla Rosenbaum (Third Cross-Defendant) Tanya Rosenbaum (Fourth Cross-Defendant) Ella Baidarman (Fifth Cross-Defendant) Dabjade Pty Ltd (Sixth Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms F Rogers (Plaintiffs/First to Fourth Cross-Defendants) Mr D A Smallbone (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
Solicitors: McNamee Legal (Plaintiffs/First to Fourth Cross Defendants) DCE Lawyers (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
Submitting Appearances: Tanya Rosenbaum (Fifth Cross-Defendant) Dabjade Pty Ltd (Sixth Cross-Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/301100 Publication restriction: N/A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate