NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Paltos v Bartier Perry Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 705 Hearing dates: 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 & 30 May 2019 Date of orders: 09 June 2020 Decision date: 09 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Subject to the issuing of a formal minute of order, I propose that judgment will issue for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,411,707.00;
(2) Direct the plaintiff to lodge a minute of order reflecting these reasons for judgment by 4:00 PM 16 June 2020;
(3) Any disagreement with the terms of the minute be filed, with submissions in support, of no more than five (5) pages, by 4:00 PM 22 June 2020 and any response by the plaintiff, also of no more than five (5) pages, by 4:00 PM 29 June 2020. The form of the orders will be dealt with on the papers. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – construction – principles – construction and interpretation – context – Partnership – Put and Call Options – survival past dissolution of Partnership – meaning of TPD and total and permanent disablement – Express Terms – Implied Terms CONTRACTS – misleading or deceptive conduct CONTRACTS – solicitor retainer – failure to advise adequately – breach of duty – negligence TORTS – negligence – joint wrongdoer – contributory negligence Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), Sch 2 (ss 18, 21) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 3, 5, 5A, 5B, 5E, 5O, 5R, 5S Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 Cases Cited: Attorney-General for New Zealand v Brown (1917) AC 393 Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd (2016) 259 CLR 1; [2016] HCA 16 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt (2019) 93 ALJR 743; [2019] HCA 18 Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 191; [1996] 3 WLR 87 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362; [1956] HCA 81 Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd (2001) 69 NSWLR 558; [2001] NSWCA 187 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Butt v McDonald (1896) 7 QLJ 68 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410; [1995] HCA 24 Campbell v Backoffıce Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304; [2009] HCA 25 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45; [2000] HCA 12 Carter v Hyde (1923) 33 CLR 115; [1923] HCA 36 Chammas v Harwood Nominees Pty Ltd (1993) 7 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-175 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169; [2014] HCA 32 Cullinane v Mercer Benefit Nominees Ltd (2006) 152 FCR 1; [2006] FCAFC 82 Dew v Richardson [1999] QSC 192 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Finance Sector Union of Australia v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2001] FCA 1613 Hawkins v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 2) (1996) 70 IR 213 Hawkins v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1996) 66 IR 322 Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539; [1988] HCA 15 Hongkong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26 Hospital Products Limited v United States Surgical Corporation and Others (1984) 156 CLR 41; [1984] HCA 64 Hurley v McDonald's Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 1728 In the Estate of A.P. Kearney [1937] 44 WN(NSW) 117 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Keddie v Stacks/Goudkamp Pty Ltd (2012) 293 ALR 764; [2012] NSWCA 254 Kendirjian v Lepore (2017) 259 CLR 275; [2017] HCA 13 Kekatos v Sanson & Anor [2009] NSWCA 171 Koompahtoo Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 115; [2007] HCA 61 Law Society of Singapore v Uthayasurian Sidambaram (2009) 4 SLR 674; [2009] SGHC 184 Laybutt v Amoco Australia Ltd (1974) 132 CLR 57; [1974] HCA 49 Luckin v Hamyln (1869) 21 LT 366 Mabbett v Josef and Sons Contracting Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1452 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 AC 251 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638; [1990] HCA 20 Mannigel v Aitken (1985) 9 FCR 1 May v Mijatovic (2002) 26 WAR 95; [2002] WASC 151 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Murdoch v British-Israel World Federation (New Zealand) Inc [1942] NZLR 600 Overlook Management BV v Foxtel Management Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 17 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451; [2004] HCA 35 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191; [1982] HCA 44 Pease v Courtney [1904] 2 Ch 503 Peters (WA) Ltd v Petersville Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 126; [2001] HCA 45 Qantas Airways Ltd v Cameron, Leonie (1996) FCR 246; [1996] FCA 349 R v Barclay (1882) 8 QBD 486 R v Gray; Ex parte Marsh (1981) 157 CLR 351; [1985] HCA 67 R v Oakes [1959] 2 QB 350 Re Bradbury, Needham v Reekie [1950] 2 All ER 1150; [1951] 1 TLR 130 Re Glyn, Public Trustee v Attorney General [1950] 66 TLR(Pt. 2) 510 Re Scowcroft [1898] 2 Ch 638 Re The Licensing Ordinance (1968) 13 FLR 143 Riley v Pickersgill [2004] UKPC 14; [2004] 4 LRC 471 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330; [2007] HCA 42 Samper v Hade (1889) 6 WN (NSW) 77 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596; [1979] HCA 51 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332; [1994] HCA 4 Shepherd v Felt & Textiles of Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359; [1931] HCA 21 State of New South Wales v Shaw (2015) 97 NSWLR 169; [2015] NSWCA 97 Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177; [1982] FCA 136 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd v Luna Park (NSW) Ltd (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 632 Trust Co of Australia v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (1997) 42 NSWLR 237 Ward v Metlife Insurance Ltd [2012] WADC 166 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661; [1985] HCA 65 Texts Cited: Enright & Merkin, Sutton on Insurance Law, 4th ed (2014) PLG Brereton, "Acting for the Incapable - A Delicate Balance" (2012) 35 Australian Bar Review 244 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dennis Paltos (Plaintiff) Bartier Perry Pty Ltd (ACN 124 690 053) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Freeman (Plaintiff) J Emmett / H Grace (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate