NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hawat v R [2020] NSWCCA 121 Hearing dates: 6 May 2020 Decision date: 11 June 2020 Before: R A Hulme J at [1]; Fagan J at [48]; Hidden AJ at [49] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – application of R v Henry guideline judgment – guideline not conflated with or used as starting point for assessment of objective seriousness – sequence of matters in judgment not necessarily sequence of judge's process of reasoning – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 97(1), 114, 115, 192E(1) Cases Cited: Fedele v R [2015] NSWCCA 286 Grant v R [2014] NSWCCA 67 Kelly v R [2017] NSWCCA 82 Legge v R [2007] NSWCCA 244 McDonald v R [2015] NSWCCA 280 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Speechley [2012] NSWCCA 130; (2012) 221 A Crim R 175 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Tuncbilek v R [2020] NSWCCA 30 Yildiz v R [2020] NSWCCA 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ahmed Hawat (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms J Paingakulam (Applicant) Mr C Curtis (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate