NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Neyland v Reid [2020] NSWSC 712 Hearing dates: 27, 28, 29 and 30 August 2019 and 6 March 2020 Decision date: 21 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Lindsay J Decision: Subject to submissions, orders to be made for judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $93,250.00 for fencing work, plus interest, after an allowance of $40,000.00 in accounting for goats on a final muster. Catchwords: AGRICULTURE – share farming agreement – Partnerships and joint ventures – Transactional business relationship – Not a partnership – Termination of relationship – Competing claims Legislation Cited: Agricultural Holdings Act 1941 NSW. Agricultural Tenancies Act 1990 NSW Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW Partnership Act 1892 NSW Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: Crawford Fitting Co v Sydney Valve & Fittings Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 438 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Sara Lee Household & Body Care (Australia) Pty Ltd (2000) 201 CLR 520 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Landwel (Vic) Pty Ltd v Neessen Investments Pty Ltd (unrep, 16 September 1996) BC 960 4304 United Dominions Corporation Ltd v Brian Proprietary Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 1 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of Australia (last updated 25 May 2017) JD Heydon, Heydon on Contract (Law Book Co, Sydney, 2019), paragraphs [24.119]-[24.120]; [3.80] Meagher, Gummow and Lehane, Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (Lexis Nexis Butterworths, Australia, 5th ed, 2015), paragraph [5-035]. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: William Francis Neyland Defendant: Brian Clarence Reid Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: SJ Philips Defendant: DAC Robertson
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate