NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hussein v Sydney Trains [2020] NSWCATAD 155 Hearing dates: 27 April 2020 Date of orders: 19 June 2020 Decision date: 19 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Decision: The application made by Sydney Trains to dismiss the Complaint is refused. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — discrimination — whether power to dismiss complaint summarily under s 102 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 should be exercised
WORDS AND PHRASES — meaning of "misconceived" and "lacking in substance"
EVIDENCE — drawing of inferences – permissible inference v conjecture and speculation Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alchin v Rail Corporation NSW [2012] NSWADT 142 BDK v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAP 129 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Marshall v Prescott [2015] NSWCA 110 Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Commissioner of Corrective Services v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 85 Commissioner of Police v Mohamed [2009] NSWCA 432 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service v Estate Edward John Russell & Ors [2001] NSWSC 745 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 at 91; [1949] HCA 1 Director-General, Department of Community Services and Anor [2003] NSWSC 1241 Flounders v Millar [2007] NSWCA 238 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 IW v City of Perth (1997) 191 CLR 1; [1997] HCA 30 Kitoko v Sydney Local Health District [2017] NSWCATAD 209 Kitoko v Sydney Local Health District [2018] NSWCATAP 38 Langley v Niland & Anor (1981) 2 NSWLR 104 Margan v University of Technology, Sydney (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 65 Obieta v Australian College of Professionals Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 38 Owners Corporation of Strata Plan 4521 v Zouk [2007] NSWCA 23 Purvis v New South Wales (2003) 217 CLR 92; [2003] HCA 62 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262; [2000] NSWCA 29 Seventh Day Adventist Church (North NSW Conference) Ltd v Seupule-Feau [2016] NSWCATAP 256 State of New South Wales v Whiteoak [2014] NSWCATAP 99 State of NSW (NSW Police Force) v Whitfield (EOD) [2012] NSWADTAP 27 Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) 173 CLR 349; [1991] HCA 49 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Qurban Ali Hussein (Applicant) Sydney Trains (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Baroni (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate