NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd v Decon Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 118 Hearing dates: 16 June 2020 Date of orders: 16 June 2020 Decision date: 19 June 2020 Before: Bell P; Macfarlan JA; Leeming JA. Decision: Leave to appeal refused, with costs. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999 (NSW) - builder served payment claim - developers failed to serve payment schedule - builder obtained judgment pursuant to Act - developers' appeal from judgment dismissed - proceedings based on construction contract pending in Technology and Construction List - late filing of cross-claim by developers - no explanation for late filing of cross-claim - developers seek further stay of judgment pending determination of main proceedings - developers claimed that they would be wound up if no stay were ordered and the cross-claim would not be adjudicated - primary judge dismissed application for a stay - whether any error of principle - whether principles in a "Grosvenor stay" applicable - Grosvenor Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Musico [2004] NSWSC 344 considered - whether developers had demonstrated basis for stay of execution - leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), ss 13, 32 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Cases Cited: Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Bellerive Homes Pty Ltd v FW Projects Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1435 Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport (2004) 61 NSWLR 421; [2004] NSWCA 394 Decon Australia Pty Ltd v TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 312 Falgat Constructions Pty Ltd v Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd (2005) 62 NSWLR 385; [2005] NSWCA 49 Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd v DSD Builders Pty Ltd (2018) 98 NSWLR 712; [2018] NSWCA 276 Grosvenor Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (in administration) v Musico [2004] NSWSC 344 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 In the matter of Pages Sales Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 616 In the matter of Tesrol Holdings Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1534 Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Pty Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 737; [2002] NSWCA 383 Live Board Holdings Ltd v Cody Live Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 302 Moutere v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] NSWSC 379; (2000) 34 ACSR 533 Seymour Whyte Constructions Pty Ltd v Ostwald Bros Pty Ltd (in liq) (2019) 99 NSWLR 317; [2019] NSWCA 11 Shade Systems Pty Ltd v Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 33 Style Timber Floor Pty Ltd v Krivosudsky (2019) 100 NSWLR 133; [2019] NSWCA 171 TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd v Decon Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 93 The Age Co Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Vanella Pty Ltd atf Capitalist Family Trust v TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 659 Vanella Pty Ltd atf Capitalist Family Trust v TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1379 Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd v Kruger Engineering Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] NSWSC 459 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd (First Applicant) Katoomba Residence Investment Pty Ltd (Second Applicant) Decon Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Christie SC, D Hume (Applicants) I Roberts SC, D Byrne (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate