NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ghosh v Medical Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWCA 122 Hearing dates: 6, 7 November 2019 (written submissions closed 12 December 2019) Date of orders: 26 June 2020 Decision date: 26 June 2020 Before: Brereton JA at [1] Emmett AJA at [121] Simpson AJA at [136] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal, insofar as it be required, be granted; (2) The appeal be allowed; (3) The decision of NCAT dismissing the appeal to it, confirming the decisions of the Medical Council, and ordering that Dr Ghosh pay the Council's costs, be set aside; (4) The matter be remitted to NCAT to be heard again, by a differently constituted panel; (5) Insofar as any extant costs order does not otherwise provide, the respondent pay 75% of the appellant's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Particular administrative bodies — NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal – Appeal under (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law s 159 against decision of Council for a health profession under s 150 and 150A – Hearing de novo – The essential task of the Tribunal in such an appeal ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Hearing rule — Rules of evidence — Examination and cross-examination – Second aspect of the rule in Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 – Whether Tribunal erred in failing to have regard to the circumstance that evidence not accepted by Tribunal went unchallenged by cross-examination ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Ground of review other than procedural fairness — Irrelevant and relevant considerations — Findings of fact – Where obvious and innocent explanation not considered in circumstances where findings were grave, devastating and infected the whole decision – Error established ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Ground of review other than procedural fairness — Decision not authorised — Statutory construction – Hearing and review of decision under (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, ss 150, 150A – Whether Council precluded from varying its earlier s 150 decision under s 150A where there is no finding of a change in circumstances by s 150A(4) – Where s 150C(2) authorises the variation of a decision without such limitation Legislation Cited: (Cth) Acts Interpretation Act 1901, s 15AA (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, Sch 5, cl 29(2), cl 29(4)(b), cl 29(7), cl 29(8) (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, Pt 7, s 5, s 73, s 75, s 83, s 149C(4)(a), s 150, s 150A, s 150C, s 150D, s 150F, s 150H, s 150I, s 159, s 159B, s 159C, s 176D(1) (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987, s 33 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970, s 48(1)(a)(iv), (vii), (b)(ii), (2)(f) Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27; [2009] HCA 41 Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 Bulstrode v Trimble [1970] VR 840 Crickitt v Medical Council of New South Wales (No 2) [2015] NSWCATOD 115 Ghosh v Medical Council of NSW [2018] NSWCATOD 186 Ghosh v Medical Council of NSW [2019] NSWCA 264 GR v Secretary, Department of Families, Disabilities and Community Services [2019] NSWCA 277 Hanna v Medical Council of NSW [2017] NSWCATOD 27 Health Care Complaints Commission v Ghosh [2020] NSWCATOD 38 Karimi v Medical Council of New South Wales [2017] NSWCATOD 180 Kirby v Dental Council of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 1869 Kirby v Dental Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWCA 99 Medical Council of New South Wales v Lee [2017] NSWCA 282 Narrier v Western Australia [2016] FCA 1519 Precision Plastics Pty Ltd v Demir (1975) 132 CLR 362; [1975] HCA 27 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ratna Ghosh (appellant) Medical Council of New South Wales (respondent) Representation: Counsel: FM Douglas QC w GR Rubagotti (appellant) O Jones (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate