NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: WX v R [2020] NSWCCA 142 Hearing dates: 15 May 2020 Date of orders: 30 June 2020 Decision date: 30 June 2020 Before: Payne JA at [1] Beech-Jones J at [3] N Adams J at [98] Decision: (1) The Appellant be granted leave to raise ground 2 of his notice of appeal. (2) The appeal be allowed. (3) The Appellant's convictions be quashed. (4) A new trial be ordered. (5) List the matter in the District Court Arraignments List at Parramatta on 17 July 2020. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeal against conviction – offence of indecent assault on a child under sixteen years of age contrary to s 61M(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 – offence of sexual intercourse with a child under the age of ten years contrary to s 66A(1) of the Crimes Act 1900 – first trial aborted – Crown tendered complainant's evidence at second and third trial – accused applied under s 306J of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 to compel complainant to give evidence – application refused – trial judge erred in construction of s 306J of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 – whether Crown Prosecutor's closing address reversed the onus of proof – ground dismissed – appeal allowed – whether new trial or acquittal – new trial ordered Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Criminal Procedure Amendment (Evidence) Act 2005 Cases Cited: ALS v R [2013] NSWCCA 63 Attorney General v Coroner of South Yorkshire [2012] EWHC 3783 BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz (2004) 221 CLR 400; [2004] HCA 61 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Castle v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 449; [2016] HCA 46 Cusack v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 155 Doe v R [2008] NSWCCA 203; (2008) 187 A Crim R 328 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131 Haoui v R [2008] NSWCCA 209; (2008) 188 A Crim R 331 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 Jiminez v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 572; [1992] HCA 14 Kalabasi v The Queen (2018) 264 CLR 62; [2018] HCA 7 MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; 80 ALJR 614 Palmer v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 1; [1998] HCA 2 Ratten v R (1974) 131 CLR 510; [1974] HCA 35 Reed v R [2006] NSWCCA 314 R v Davies (1995) 83 A Crim R 502; (1996) 39 NSWLR 450 R v Smith [2000] NSWCCA 468 R v Taufahema (2007) 228 CLR 232; [2007] HCA 11 R v Tyrone Chishimba [2010] NSWCCA 228 Spies v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 603; [2000] HCA 43 TKJW v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81 Texts Cited: Criminal Procedure Amendment (Sexual and Other Offences) Bill 2006 Category: Principal judgment Parties: WX (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Lawrence (Appellant) M Kumar (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate