NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Department of Communities and Justice v Zonnevylle [2020] NSWCATAP 126 Hearing dates: On the Papers Date of orders: 30 June 2020 Decision date: 30 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Hennessy ADCJ, Deputy President S Westgarth, Deputy President A Suthers, Principal Member Decision: (1) A hearing of each of Mr Zonnevylle's applications for interlocutory orders and applications for miscellaneous orders is dispensed with. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Orders 1 and 2 made on 22 October 2019 are set aside. (4) In substitution for those orders, the following orders are made: (5) The decision of the Department of Communities and Justice that Mr Zonnevylle's application for access to government information received on 5 September 2018, is invalid, is affirmed. (6) Each of Mr Zonnevylle's applications for interlocutory orders and applications for miscellaneous orders is dismissed. Catchwords: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – access to government information – where applicant applied for government information but did not include such information as was reasonably necessary to enable the government information applied for to be identified – whether application wholly invalid - meaning of phrase "the government information applied for" in s 41(1)(e) of Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: City of Port Adelaide Enfield v Minister for Transport and Urban Planning [1999] SASC 73; (1999) 73 SASR 22 Federal Cmr of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503 Mills v Meeking [1990] HCA 6; (1990) 169 CLR 214 Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (1996) 91 LGERA 31 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 at 384; 153 ALR 490 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 347 ALR 405 Texts Cited: Pearce and Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, (9th ed, 2019, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Department of Communities and Justice (Appellant) Peter Zonnevylle (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Crown Solicitor (Appellant) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): AP 19/51762 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Citation: [2019] NSWCATAD 215 Date of Decision: 22 October 2019 Before: D Robertson, Senior Member File Number(s): 2019/00356297
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate