NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Maher v Maher [2020] NSWSC 844 Hearing dates: 29 and 30 June 2020 Date of orders: 30 June 2020 Decision date: 30 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [59] Catchwords: EQUITY – trusts and trustees – express trust – interest in property – family arrangement with plaintiff's in-laws to live with them in property to be purchased by them – no intention to create immediate legally enforceable commitment or interest EQUITY – trusts and trustees – constructive trusts – common intention – no contribution to acquisition of property ESTOPPEL – proprietary estoppel – encouragement – detrimental reliance – no contribution to property – no evidence of financial detriment – plaintiff and her family lived on property at subsidised rate and received a reasonable income from working in the family business Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 23C Cases Cited: Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 Muschinski v Dodds (1985)160 CLR 583 Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 9 Peldan v Anderson (2006) 227 CLR 471 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Victoria Maher (Plaintiff) Josephine Maher (First Defendant) Robray Debeaking Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Allen (Plaintiff) F Maghami (First and Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate