Dogan v R [2020] NSWCCA 151

Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dogan v R [2020] NSWCCA 151 Hearing dates: 8 May 2020 Date of orders: 3 July 2020 Decision date: 03 July 2020 Before: R A Hulme J at [1] Fagan J at [8] Cavanagh J at [22] Decision: The application for an extension of time in which to file the notice of application for leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against conviction — extension of time in which to appeal — point not raised below — where vulnerable complainant gave evidence at trial in manner provided by Ch 6 Pt 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) — where all parties consented to course taken at trial — whether trial judge first required to form independent satisfaction of condition in s 306P(2) — whether miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 86, 94, 97, 99, 112, 192E Crimes Amendment (Cognitive Impairment – Sexual Offences) Act 2008 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5(1)(b), 10(1)(b) Criminal Appeal Rules, rr 3A, 4, 23C Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Ch 6 Pt 6, ss 3, 294B, 306O, 306P, 306S, 306V, 306ZJ Criminal Procedure Amendment (Vulnerable Persons) Act 2007 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 59, 112 Evidence (Children) Act 1997 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 59 Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656; [2012] NSWCA 308 ARS v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 266 CF v R [2017] NSWCCA 318 Hilton v Legal Profession Admission Board [2017] NSWCA 232 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Panchal v R; R v Panchal [2014] NSWCCA 275 Perish v R; Perish v R; Lawton v R (2016) 92 NSWLR 161; [2016] NSWCCA 89 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Smith v Western Australia (2014) 250 CLR 473; [2014] HCA 3 Stanoevski v The Queen (2001) 202 CLR 115; [2001] HCA 4 Texts Cited: Crimes Amendment (Cognitive Impairment – Sexual Offences) Bill 2008 New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 26 June 2008 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hakan Dogan (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Applicant) M Millward (Respondent)