NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2020] NSWCA 136 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 08 July 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Leeming JA at [3]. Decision: (1) Order, pursuant to s 7 of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), that the applicants be referred to as DRJ, DRK, DRL, DRM and DRN, respectively, until 8 July 2023. (2) Order (1) above is made on the basis that it is necessary to protect the safety of the applicants. (3) The Court notes that pages 71-498 of the White Folder will be securely destroyed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - pseudonym orders under Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) - requirement to take into account public interest in open justice - requirement to specify basis and duration - requirement that order be necessary - contrast with orders under Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) s 64 Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 50, 64 Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), ss 6, 7, 8, 12 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 50 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 48 Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW), s 51 Cases Cited: AB (A pseudonym) v R (No 3) (2019) 97 NSWLR 1046; [2019] NSWCCA 46 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 43 FLR 129 Burton v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (2019) 100 NSWLR 734; [2019] NSWCA 245 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Zhao (2015) 255 CLR 46; [2015] HCA 5 DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2019] NSWCATAD 195 Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim [2012] NSWCCA 125 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 HT v The Queen [2019] HCA 40; 93 ALJR 1307 Misrachi v The Public Guardian [2019] NSWCA 67 Rinehart v Welker [2011] NSWSC 1094 Rinehart v Welker (2011) 93 NSWLR 311; [2011] NSWCA 403 Tilley v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCA 174 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: DRJ (First applicant) DRK (Second applicant) DRL (Third applicant) DRM (Fourth applicant) DRN (Fifth applicant) Commissioner of Victims Rights (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Eastman SC, D Hume (Applicants) J Emmett (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate