NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Givney [2020] NSWDC 353 Decision date: 10 March 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Payne DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence of five years, with a non-parole period of three years three months Catchwords: SENTENCING – child sex offences – grooming child for unlawful sexual activity, Crimes Act 1900, s 66EB(3) – sexual intercourse with child 14-16, Crimes Act 1900, s 66C(3) – indecent assault person under 16 years, Crimes Act 1900, s 61M(2) Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, ss 61M(2), 66C(3), 66EB(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Stephen James Givney (Offender) Representation: Counsel: S Bouveng (Offender)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Geoff Archer (Offender) File Number(s): 2019/62510
Judgment 1. In relation to this matter, Stephen James Givney comes before the Court in respect of three offences. The first offence is one of grooming child, s 66EB(3) Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty prescribed for this offence is imprisonment for 10 years with a standard non-parole period prescribed of four years. Count 2, indecent assault person under age of 16 years (15 years), s 61M(2) Crimes Act. The maximum penalty prescribed is 10 years with a standard non-parole period of eight years. And then count 3, sexual intercourse with a person between 14 and 16 years, namely 15 years, s 66C(3) Crimes Act. The maximum penalty prescribed for the offence is 10 years with no standard non-parole period prescribed. 1. Each of the offences, it is alleged, took place on 17 November 2018. Each of them were Table 1 offences and could have been dealt with summarily but as I understand it, this was not contended otherwise than to be a factor. 2. I convict him of these offences.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate