NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Michael Brown Planning Strategies Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2020] NSWCA 137 Hearing dates: 3 June 2020 Date of orders: 8 July 2020 Decision date: 08 July 2020 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Meagher JA at [39]; Emmett AJA at [40] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal on the proposed question of law. (2) Dismiss the appeal. (3) Order the applicant to pay the Council's costs in this Court. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – development application – power to grant consent – local environmental plan – requirement that proposed development "is compatible" with the "flood hazard" of the land – assessing compatibility at date of determining application – whether future measures to ameliorate flood hazard relevant – future measures not part of application – Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 (NSW), cl 7.9(3)(a) STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – extrinsic materials – dictionaries – usefulness of reliance on dictionaries in statutory interpretation STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – immediate context – consistency of operation – local environmental plan – statutory precondition to granting development consent – grammatical tense of clause – requirement for contextual construction of clause Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), ss 56A, 57 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 1.5, 4.2, 4.15, 4.16, 4.53; Div 4.1 Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010, cl 7.9 Cases Cited: Bendixen v Coleman (1943) 68 CLR 401; [1943] HCA 40 Michael Brown Planning Strategies v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1311 Provincial Insurance Australia Pty Ltd v Consolidated Wood Products Pty Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 541 Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd (2004) 61 NSWLR 707; [2004] NSWCA 422 Texts Cited: P Herzfeld, T Prince, Interpretation (2nd ed, Thomson Reuters, 2020) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Brown Planning Strategies Pty Ltd (Applicant) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Hutley SC / Mr C Ireland (Applicant) Mr C Leggat SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate