NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kazantzis v R [2020] NSWCCA 161 Hearing dates: 18 June 2020 Date of orders: 16 July 2020 Decision date: 16 July 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Davies J at [75]; Wilson J at [79] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – appeal against conviction – sexual assault offences – applicant convicted of one count and acquitted of two counts – whether jury verdict was unreasonable or unsupportable having regard to the evidence – open to the jury to be satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5(1)(b) Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hamilton (a pseudonym) v R [2020] NSWCCA 80 M v R (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Mackenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 Pell v R (2020) 94 ALJR 394; [2020] HCA 12 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 RC v R; R v RC [2020] NSWCCA 76 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Kazantzis (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Ozen SC (Applicant) F Veltro (Respondent)
Solicitors: Benjamin Leonardo - The Defenders (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions NSW (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00163869 Publication restriction: N/A Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 12 December 2018 Before: North DCJ File Number(s): 2016/00163869
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate