NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission [2020] NSWCA 146 Hearing dates: 17 June 2020 Date of orders: 15 July 2020 Decision date: 15 July 2020 Before: Macfarlan JA; McCallum JA Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: HEALTH – health practitioner – refusal to order reinstatement of applicant as a psychologist – Health Practitioner Regulation National Law s 163B – whether NCAT could take into account applicant's spent convictions – Criminal Records Act ss 12, 16(1) Legislation Cited: Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Medical Practice Act 1992 (NSW) Psychologists Act 2001 (NSW) Cases Cited: Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2019) 93 ALJR 629; [2019] HCA 16 Kocic v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (2014) 88 NSWLR 159; [2014] NSWCA 368 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Dr Vito Zepinic (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented Applicant Ms P Lowson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Self-represented Applicant Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/43054 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Common Law Citation: [2020] NSWSC 13 Date of Decision: 3 February 2020 Before: N Adams J File Number(s): 2018/385664
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate