NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Freixas v Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Customer Service (No 2) [2020] NSWCATOD 78 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 15 July 2020 Decision date: 15 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member N Halstead, General Member Decision: (1) the applicant be reprimanded under s 48(b) of the BDC Act; (2) the applicant be required under s 48(c) of the BDC Act to pay to the respondent, as a penalty, $20,000.00 within one month; (3) a condition be imposed on the registration of the applicant as a registered certifier under s 48(d) of the BDC Act that he undertakes the UTS advanced building regulation course within the next 12 months. Catchwords: PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE – review of decision of Building Professionals Board to discipline an accredited certifier - unsatisfactory professional conduct – appropriate action Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW), s 63 Building and Development Certifiers Act 2018 (NSW), ss 3, 4, Pt 2, ss 48, 49, 50, 121, Scl 1 Building Professionals Act 2005 (NSW), ss19, 34, 77 (repealed) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 50 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 3 Div 4 Cases Cited: Boyce v Building Professionals Board (No 2) [2020] NSWCATOD 14 Building Professionals Board v Boulle [2008] NSWADT 80 Carroll v Sydney City Council (1989) 15 NSWLR 541 Craig v Medical Board of South Australia [2001] SASC 169; (2001) 79 SASR 545 Director General, Department of Fair Trading v Cohen [2000] NSWFTT 3 Hallal v Building Professionals Board [2016] NSWCATOD 78 Khosa v Legal Profession Complaints Committee [2017] WASCA 192 Lilli v Building Professionals Board [2019] NSWCATOD 119 Levick v Building Professionals Board [2018] NSWCATOD 125 Murrant v Building Professionals Board [2019] NSWCATOD 130 NEAT Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Ltd [2003] HCA 35; (2003) 216 CLR 277 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50; (2015) 258 CLR 173 Qiu v Building Professionals Board [2013] NSWADT 289 R v Secretary of State for Home Department; Ex parte Venables [1998] AC 407 Stirling v Legal Services Commissioner [2013] VSCA 374 Treble v Building Professionals Board [2019] NSWCATOD 34 Ziems v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales [1957] HCA 46; (1957) 97 CLR 279 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maurice Freixas (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Customer Service (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Tomasetti SC and J Mack (Applicant) M Fozzard (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate