NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Balzola v Passas [2020] NSWSC 896 Hearing dates: 29; 30 April 2019; 1; 3; 14 May 2019 Date of orders: 31 July 2020 Decision date: 31 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: See paragraph 256 Catchwords: DEFAMATION – oral defamatory statement – defences – common law qualified privilege – reply to attack – remedies – aggravated damages – compensatory damages – damage to reputation – injury to feelings – grapevine effect Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 100 Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 7, 30, 34, 35 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 140 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1900 (NSW) s 32 Cases Cited: Balzola v Passas [2019] NSWSC 1724 Bashford v Information Australia Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 366; [2004] HCA 5 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 44; [1993] HCA 31 Cerutti v Crestside [2016] 1 Qd R 89; [2014] QCA 33 Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd (1998) 193 CLR 519; [1998] HCA 37 Coles Supermarkets Australia Ltd v Clarke [2013] NSWCA 272 Feo v Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty Ltd [1999] 3 VR 417; [1999] VSCA 180 Howden v "Truth" and "Sportsman" Limited & Anor (1937) 58 CLR 416; [1937] HCA 74 Penton v Calwell (1945) 70 CLR 219 Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England [1924] 1KB 461 Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149; [2018] HCA 25 Umeyor v Ibe [2016] EWHC 862 Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118; [1966] HCA 40 Texts Cited: John G Fleming, Law of Torts (8th ed, 1992, Law Book Company) Richard Parkes QC et al, Gatley on Libel and Slander (12th ed, 2017, Sweet and Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Balzola (Plaintiff) Julie Passas (First Defendant) Anthony Raciti (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Rasmussen (Plaintiff) Mr N Kirby (Defendants) Solicitors: Stewart Cuddy & Mokkler (Plaintiff) Otto Stichter & Associates (Defendants) File Number(s): 2017/86708
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate