NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Syed v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATAP 147 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 21 July 2020 Decision date: 21 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: The Hon F Marks Principal Member J Lonsdale Senior Member Decision: The appellant is to pay the costs of the respondent of these appeal proceedings in an amount assessed on the basis set out in the legal costs legislation as defined in section 3A of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 in default of agreement. Catchwords: APPEAL-COSTS-appeal withdrawn-costs jurisdiction under Rules 38 and 38A-costs follow the event-application for costs order against solicitors declined-application for indemnity costs declined – costs order made. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act s 60 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 38,38A Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 s 3A Cases Cited: Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59. Texts Cited: None cited Category: Costs Parties: Kashif Sayed (Appellant) Metricon Homes Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Kashif Sayed (Appellant) Moray and Agnew Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): AP20/18975 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 25 March 2020 Before: S Hennings General Member File Number(s): HB 19/16615; HB 19/23909
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate