NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fantakis v Local Court of New South Wales [2020] NSWSC 931 Hearing dates: 17 July 2020 Decision date: 22 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against the judgment of his Honour Rodgers LCM is refused. (2) The stay of proceedings ordered on 17 July 2020 is removed. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – plaintiff facing two charges of intimidate police – subpoena issued by plaintiff – whether legitimate forensic purpose – application to set aside subpoena by Commissioner of Police – order by magistrate setting subpoena aside – credit of complainant in intimidation charges important – whether reasonable grounds to think that documents relevant to credit of complainant will be found – whether documents sought in subpoena are relevant to intimidation charges – APPEAL – interlocutory application before Local Court – leave to appeal necessary pursuant to s 53(3)(b) of Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) – limitation on role of court hearing application for leave to appeal – leave to appeal refused. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – s 60(1) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) – s 53(3)(b) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) – s 69 Supreme Court Rules 1970 – Pt 51, r 6(1), r 6(2) Cases Cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404; [1984] HCA 85 Attorney General for New South Wales v Dylan Chidgey (2008) 182 A Crim R 536; [2008] NSWCCA 65 Feeney v NSW Police [2017] NSWSC 190 Franklin v Commissioner of Police and Anor [2018] NSWSC 310 Mackintosh v Commissioner of Police (NSW) and Ors [2010] NSWSC 1064 NAR v PPC1 (2013) 224 A Crim R 535; [2013] NSWCCA 25 PPC v Williams (2013) 238 A Crim R 25; [2013] NSWCCA 286 R v PL (2009) 199 A Crim R 199; [2009] NSWCCA 256 R v Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278; [1986] HCA 88 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Terry (Elefterios) Fantakis – Plaintiff Local Court of NSW – First Defendant Commissioner of NSW Police – Second Defendant Detective Senior Sergeant Mark Dukes – Third Defendant Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff – Self-represented R Bhalla – Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate