NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: KJ v SJ [2020] NSWSC 932 Hearing dates: 6, 7, 8 and 9 July 2020 Date of orders: 23 July 2020 Decision date: 23 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Protective List Before: Williams J Decision: Application pursuant to s 86 of the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW) ("the Act") for the revocation of a declaration that the applicant is incapable of managing her own affairs and of orders that the applicant's estate be subject to management under the Act is dismissed. Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – protected person – application pursuant to s 86 of the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW) ("the Act") for revocation of a declaration made that the applicant is incapable of managing her affairs and of orders that the applicant's estate be subject to management under the Act – where applicant suffered a traumatic brain injury in an accident as a child – where applicant received a significant sum of money in a settlement of legal proceedings commenced following the accident – where applicant is presently married, works part–time and is the primary carer of three children – where memory and insight following the accident is and continues to be poor – where applicant suffers from executive dysfunction – where applicant experiences difficulty in managing household and personal finances – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3 and 14 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 601WBA NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW) ss 38, 39, 41 and 86 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 7.13, 7.15 and 7.16 Cases Cited: CJ v AJK [2015] NSWSC 498 IA v TA [2016] NSWCA 179 P v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC 579 Re D [2012] NSWSC 1006 Re R [2014] NSWSC 1810 Re X [2016] NSWSC 275 Category: Principal judgment Parties: KJ (Plaintiff/First Respondent) SJ (Defendant/Applicant) The Trust Company (Australia) Ltd (Second Respondent) NSW Trustee and Guardian (Third Respondent) Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Hickey (Plaintiff/First Respondent) Mr J A Dalzell AM (Defendant/Applicant) Mr M K Meek SC (Second and Fourth Respondent) Ms J Brouwer, solicitor (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate