NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jaghbir (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 955 Hearing dates: 16 July 2020 Date of orders: 16 July 2020 Decision date: 29 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Accused's application for a judge-alone trial granted pursuant to s 132A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - trial - application for trial by judge alone pursuant to s 132A of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) - where case relies on circumstantial evidence - where press has reported on circumstances and witnesses surrounding this trial – where directions to a jury would have ameliorated any prejudice which this material posed for the accused - where circumstances arising out of current COVID-19 pandemic - where trial has already experienced significant delay - where the risk of further delay is unacceptable - order made for judge alone trial Legislation Cited: COVID-19 Legislation Amendment (Emergency Measures - Miscellaneous) Act 2020 (NSW) Crime Commission Act 2012 (NSW) s 45 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 132, 365 Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT) s 68BA Cases Cited: Allen v R [2020] NSWCCA 173 Mickelberg v R (No 3) (1992) 8 WAR 236 R v Coleman [2020] ACTSC 97 R v UD (No 2) [2020] ACTSC 90 Regina v BD (No. 1) (Judge alone application) [2020] NSWDC 150 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Crown Ahmed Jaghbir (Accused) Representation: Counsel: P Barrett (Crown) G James QC & E James (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate