NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Savills (NSW) Pty Ltd v ATF CTH Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 956 Hearing dates: 13, 14, 15 and 16 July 2020 Decision date: 27 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) Unless any party applies for a different costs order by written application to my Associate within 7 days, order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — Formation — alleged agreement that plaintiff would act as exclusive agent for sale of defendant's real property — where plaintiff claims commission for sale of property under agreement — whether contract was executed CONTRACTS — Construction — Where plaintiff's entitlement to commission dependent on meaning of "Property" under the contract — relevance of surrounding circumstances to resolve ambiguity CONSUMER LAW — Unconscionable conduct — In connection with goods or services — whether defendant's conduct unconscionable DAMAGES — Proof and calculation of damages —responsibility of the Court to make best assessment of damages — lack of evidence — no loss proved by plaintiff Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, ss 21, 236 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 48, 142 Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW), s 55 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 21.2, 42.1 Cases Cited: British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Cowell (2002) 7 VR 524; [2002] VSCA 197 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64; [1991] HCA 54 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193; [1993] HCA 63 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited [2002] VSC 73 McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377; [1951] HCA 79 Nominal Defendant v Rooskov [2012] NSWCA 43 Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 10; (2003) 77 ALJR 768 Qantas Airways Limited v Cameron (1996) 66 FCR 246 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Savills (NSW) Pty Ltd (ABN 93 002 647 225) (Plaintiff) ATF CTH Pty Ltd (ABN 52 169 623 741) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Wood SC (Plaintiff) A Cheshire SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate