NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pethybridge v R [2020] NSWCCA 185 Hearing dates: 21 July 2020 Date of orders: 21 July 2020 Decision date: 04 August 2020 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Lonergan J at [123]; Hidden AJ at [125]. Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Quash the guilty verdicts on counts 2 and 3 of the indictment, and in lieu thereof enter verdicts of acquittal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – unreasonable verdict – whether guilty verdicts on second and third counts irreconcilable with acquittal on first count – whether evidence capable of supporting guilty verdicts Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), s 22 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61HA, 61HE, 61I, 61L, 578A Cases Cited: Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Pell v The Queen [2020] HCA 12; 94 ALJR 394 Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jack Pethybridge (Applicant) R (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Cook (Applicant) D Patch (Respondent)
Solicitors: Macedone Legal (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00262241 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 31 January 2020 Before: Girdham SC DCJ File Number(s): 2018/00262241
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate