NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bahamad v Wong [2020] NSWSC 991 Hearing dates: 21, 22 & 23 October and 18 November 2019 Date of orders: 3 August 2020 Decision date: 03 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Specified lump sum costs order made in the amount of $187,860.63. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Costs orders – Gross sum costs order – Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) – plaintiffs claim relief under Conveyancing Act 1919, s 88K for the creation of an easement over the defendants' properties – proceedings settled after three days of hearing – parties agree that plaintiffs will pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings up to and including the first day of hearing – dispute about which party will pay the costs of the second and third day of hearing – order made for the making of a gross sum costs order – parties at issue about the appropriate quantum of a gross sum costs order. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 30(4)(a), 56(1), 57(1)(d), 60, 98(4)(c) Conveyancing Act 1919, ss 88K, 88K(5), Schedule 8, Part 3 Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014. Supreme Court Act 1970 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Cases Cited: Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd (No. 10) [2017] NSWSC 16 Australasian Performing Rights Assoc Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No. 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow (2019) 372 ALR 555 Edgar & Walker v Mead (1916) 23 CLR 29 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Hancock v Rinehart (Lump Sum Costs) [2015] NSWSC 1640 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Kostov v Zhang (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 2790 Lakis v Lardis (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 1296 Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney Local Health District; Sydney Local Health District v Macquarie Health Corporation Ltd (No. 12) [2019] NSWSC 916 Makaroff v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1043 Maylord Equity Management Pty Ltd as trustee of the Batterham Retirement Fund v Nauer (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 1783 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No.3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Royal v El Ali (No. 3) [2016] FCA 1573 Shiv Abi-K Pty Ltd (2004) 87 NSWLR 568 Silva v Czarnikow Limited (1960) 104 SJ 369 Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 4) (2013) 272 FLR 414 Smilevska v Smilevska (No. 5) [2019] NSWSC 986 Russo & Ors v Russo & Ors (No. 4) [2016] NSWSC 1133 Willmott v Barber (1881) 17 Ch D 772 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 99 Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Plaintiff: Noureddine Bahamad Second Plaintiff: Afaf Bahamad First Defendant: Carson Wong Second Defendant: Siobhan Wong Third Defendant: Mark David Layson Fourth Defendant: Sally Rae Layson Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs: G. Farland, M. Keene Defendants: J.A.C. Potts, A.R. Langshaw
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate