NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gillespie v R [2020] NSWCCA 186 Hearing dates: 14 July 2020 Date of orders: 4 August 2020 Decision date: 04 August 2020 Before: Ward JA at [1]; Wilson J at [166]; Ierace J at [167] Decision: 1. Extend time for the filing of the application for leave to appeal to 24 April 2020. 2. Refuse the application for leave to appeal on all grounds. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Miscarriage of justice — Where various errors alleged — Alleged incompetence of counsel — Alleged error in refusal to grant adjournment — Alleged error in permitting re-examination— Alleged error in direction as to permissible inferences Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 306J, 306K, Ch 3, Pt 3, Div 3 Cases Cited: Ali v The Queen [2005] HCA 8; (2005) 79 ALJR 662 Alkhair v R [2016] NSWCCA 4; (2016) 255 A Crim R 419 Aravena v R (2015) 91 NSWLR 258; [2015] NSWCCA 288 Azzopardi v The Queen (2001) 205 CLR 50; [2001] HCA 25 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 (HL) Davis v R [2017] NSWCCA 257 De Silva v The Queen [2019] HCA 48; (2019) 375 ALR 1 Fennell v The Queen [2019] HCA 37; (2019) 373 ALR 433 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Ghazal v G10 (1992) 29 NSWLR 336 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Liberato v The Queen (1985) 159 CLR 507; [1985] HCA 66 Moustafa v R [2019] NSWCCA 89 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; (2006) 162 A Crim R 301 Potier v R [2015] NSWCCA 130 R v Alexandroaia (1995) 81 A Crim R 286 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 R v Kneebone (1999) 47 NSWLR 450; [1999] NSWCCA 279 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12; (1987) 30 A Crim R 315 R v RTB [2002] NSWCCA 104 Roach v R [2019] NSWCCA 160 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Slotboom v R [2013] NSWCCA 18 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Trevor Gillespie (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Blaker (Applicant) (Solicitor) Ms M Kumar (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate