NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police v DTN [2020] NSWCATAP 165 Hearing dates: 17 July 2020 Date of orders: 4 August 2020 Decision date: 04 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Cole DCJ, Deputy President J Kearney, Senior Member. Decision: The appellant's application for leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Privacy – appeal from an interlocutory decision of the Tribunal – leave to appeal - application for internal review of conduct – meaning of 'the time the applicant first became aware of the conduct the subject of the application' – principal and agent – imputed knowledge Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: DTN v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 107 Department of Education and Training v EM [2011] NSWADTAP 4 Deming No 456 Pty Ltd v Brisbane Unit Development Corporation Pty Ltd (1983) 155 CLR 129; [1983] HCA 44 Harris v Commercial Minerals Ltd (1995-96) 186 CLR 1; [1996] HCA 49 Waldron v Joondalup Hospital Pty Ltd (2018) 98 NSWLR 552; [2018] NSWCA 182 Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 9) (2008) 225 FLR 1; [2008] WASC 239 Almona Pty Ltd v Parklea Corporation Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1868 Wassef v Panagiotopoulos [2019] NSWCATAP 18 Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCA 106 Re Association of Architects of Australia; Ex parte Municipal Officers Association of Australia (1989) 63 ALJR 298 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of Police (Appellant) DTN (Respondent) Representation: Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Appellant) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): AP 20/21699 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the publication of the name of the respondent to this appeal is prohibited. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Citation: [2020] NSWCATAD 107 Date of Decision: 17 April 2020 Before: M Easton, Senior Member File Number(s): 2019/00350181
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate