NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rummukainen v R [2020] NSWCCA 187 Hearing dates: 16 July 2020 Date of orders: 3 August 2020 Decision date: 03 August 2020 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Wilson J at [33]; Ierace J at [34] Decision: (1) Application for leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – application for leave to appeal – where applicant found guilty of dangerous driving occasioning death – where applicant consumed alcohol prior to collision – where sentencing judge not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that applicant's blood alcohol concentration was greater than 0.05 at time of collision – whether sentencing judge erred in taking into account the applicant's consumption of alcohol prior to the collision Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 52A(1)(c) Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW), ss 108, 110, sch 3 cl 31 Cases Cited: Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Manok [2017] NSWCCA 232; (2017) 81 MVR 427 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 R v Rummukainen [2019] NSWDC 452 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Shashati v R [2018] NSWCCA 167; (2018) 85 MVR 194 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Risto Petteri Rummukainen (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Lawrence with A Wilson (Applicant) B Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate