NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Breed v Boral [2020] NSWSC 1000 Hearing dates: 28 July 2020 Date of orders: 28 July 2020 Decision date: 28 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: Orders made as sought by the first defendant. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – hearings – ex parte – suppression and non-publication – where application made to dispense with the requirements of the UCPR – where non-compliance is in the interests of the elucidation of the truth – where there is a legitimate forensic purpose Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 57, 58 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 2.1, 31.10 Cases Cited: Boyes v Colins (2000) 23 WAR 123; [2000] WASCA 344 Brown v Metro Meat International Ltd [2000] WASCA 123 Halpin and Others v Lumley General Insurance Limited (2009) 78 NSWLR 265, [2009] NSWCA 372 Latimer v Day [2015] NSWSC 11 Markus v Provincial Insurance Company Limited [1983] 25 NSWCCR 1 National Employers' Mutual General Insurance Association Limited v Waind and Hill [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure New South Wales Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd (Applicant) Ex parte Representation: Counsel: J Catsanos with Ms G Keating (Applicant)
Solicitors: Makinson d'Apice Lawyers (Applicant) File Number(s): 2013/198101 Publication restriction: Restriction lifted
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate