NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mouzakzak v The Nominal Defendant (No. 3) [2020] NSWDC 423 Hearing dates: 27-31 July 2020 Date of orders: 06 August 2020 Decision date: 06 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 259 Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – motor vehicle accident – claim for damages against Nominal Defendant – whether unidentified vehicle collided with vehicle in which plaintiff was front-seat passenger, causing it to veer off roadway and strike a tree EVIDENCE – civil standard of proof – where Nominal Defendant's alternative version of incident involves suggested fraud or dishonesty by driver – whether allegation affects ultimate onus of proof Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 118 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352 McLennan v Nominal Defendant [2014] NSWCA 332 New South Wales v Fuller-Lyons [2014] NSWCA 424 Nguyen v Tran [2018] NSWCA 215 Telfer v Telfer (2014) 87 NSWLR 176 The Nominal Defendant v Cordin [2019] NSWCA 85 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ms S Mouzakzak The Nominal Defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr H Marshall SC and Mr J Tryon for the plaintiff Mr K Rewell SC for the defendant
Solicitors: Prominent Lawyers (Plaintiff) Hall & Wilcox (Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/231550 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate