NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Collins v R [2020] NSWCCA 198 Hearing dates: 5 June 2020 Decision date: 10 August 2020 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Wilson J at [93]; N Adams J at [94] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal on ground 1. (2) Allow the appeal against conviction. (3) Quash the convictions on counts 1, 2 and 6 and in lieu thereof enter verdicts of acquittal on those counts. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – unreasonable verdict – multiple charges of sexual offences against same child complainant – where only direct evidence of offending was complainant's complaint and testimony – where jury acquitted applicant of 3 counts and convicted of 3 counts – whether acquittals necessarily diminished the overall credibility of the complainant's evidence such that remaining convictions could not reasonably be supported and accordingly were not "open" to the jury. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M, 66C Cases Cited: AH v R [2019] NSWCCA 152 Cabot (a pseudonym) v R [2018] NSWCCA 265 Chen v DPP (2011) 83 NSWLR 224; [2011] NSWCCA 205 Gilbert v R (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 IMM v R (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 Kurdi v R [2011] NSWCCA 179 Lane v R (2018) 265 CLR 196; [2018] HCA 28 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79; [1989] HCA 60 MacKenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 Nguyen v R [2017] NSWCCA 145 Norris v R [2007] NSWCCA 235 PA v R [2015] NSWCCA 18 Pell v R [2019] VSCA 186 Qualtieri v R [2006] NSWCCA 95; (2006) 171 A Crim R 463 R v ACK [2000] NSWCCA 180 R v Crisologo (1997) 99 A Crim R 178 R v J (No 2) [1998] 3 VR 602 R v Kirkman (1987) 44 SASR 591 R v KRL [2007] NSWCCA 354 R v TK (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCA 151 Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 TB v R [2019] NSWCCA 224 Xu v R [2019] NSWCCA 178 XY v R (2013) 84 NSWLR 363; [2013] NSWCCA 121 Youkhanis v R [2014] NSWCCA 220 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 Ganiji v R [2019] NSWCCA 208 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Collins (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate