NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kuroz [2020] NSWDC 427 Hearing dates: 29 – 30 June 2020 (Trial); 1 – 3, 7 – 9, 13 July 2020 (Trial); 7 August 2020 (Judgment) Date of orders: 7 August 2020 Decision date: 07 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Weber SC DCJ Decision: (1) That the accused is found guilty of counts 1, 2, and 3 on the indictment; (2) That the accused is found not guilty of count 4 on the indictment; (3) That the accused is found guilty of two statutory alternative offences to count 4 pursuant to section 25A(4) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), namely: (i) the supply of prohibited drugs to Athanasios Syrios on or about 9 June 2016, in the amount of 160 MDMA capsules being 13.5 grams, contrary to section 25(1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW); and, (ii) the supply of prohibited drugs of not less than a commercial quantity to unknown persons in the Campbelltown area, such supply being of 140 grams of MDMA, valued at $8000, contrary to section 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW). (4) That the Court enter convictions in respect of each offence accordingly. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Judge alone CRIME — Defences — Mental illness – Standard of proof to the civil standard – Burden of proof on the accused – whether the accused was labouring from a defect of reason owing to a disease of the mind as to not know that what he was doing was wrong at the time of the offending – expert evidence of forensic and treating psychiatrists – accused an unreliable historian CRIME — Drug offences — Conspiracy — Supply prohibited drug — Large commercial quantity – whether the accused intended to carry out the agreement CRIME — Drug offences — Supply prohibited drug — Commercial quantities CRIME — Drug offences — Ongoing supply — Availability of alternative verdicts – whether each relevant supply can be made out to the requisite standard of proof Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Cases Cited: Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250 Gerakiteys v The Queen (1984) 153 CLR 317 Liberato v The Queen (1985) 159 CLR 507 Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493; [1998] HCA 7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Director of Public Prosecutions Koray Kuroz Representation: Counsel: Ms M. Fleeton (Crown Prosecutor) Mr R. Pontello SC (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate