NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kohler Bros Property Group Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2020] NSWLEC 1364 Hearing dates: 11-12, 20 May 2020 Date of orders: 14 August 2020 Decision date: 14 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is refused. (2) The development application (DA 18/848) for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a boarding house at 71-73 Second Avenue, Kingswood, is refused. (3) The exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits B, D, 2 and 4. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – boarding house – whether development can be refused on the basis of parking – whether development can be refused on the basis of landscaped area – whether the design is compatible with the character of the local area – adequacy of setbacks Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010 State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 Cases Cited: Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council (2005) 142 LGERA 80; [2005] NSWLEC 191 Texts Cited: Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, COVID-19 Pandemic Arrangements Policy (March, 2020) Penrith Development Control Plan 2014 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kohler Bros Property Group Pty Ltd (Applicant) Penrith City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R O'Gorman-Hughes (Applicant) R White (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate