NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Atkinson v Coles Supermarkets Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1063 Hearing dates: 26 and 29 May, and 11 June 2020 Date of orders: 11 June 2020 Decision date: 13 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: The plaintiff's draft letters and proposed questions for the expert damages conclaves are rejected. See paragraph [47] for additional costs order. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — court administration — case management — practice notes — expert conclaves — issue as to the drafting and provision of questions to expert damages conclaves — plaintiff's proposed questions contrary to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) and practice notes concerning joint expert reports and concurrent evidence — proposed questions rejected Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158; [1960] HCA 58 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164; [1965] HCA 34 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: David Arthur Atkinson (Plaintiff) Coles Supermarkets Pty Ltd (Defendant) Linfox Australia Pty Ltd (Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Beale / J Doyon (Plaintiff) D Talintyre (Defendant) N Brown (Cross-Defendant)
Solicitors: CMC Lawyers (Plaintiff) Lander & Rogers Lawyers (Defendant) Meridian Lawyers (Cross-Defendant) File Number(s): 2017/171732 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate