NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Charter Pacific Corporation Limited v Securicom (NSW) Pty Limited (in liq) (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1067 Hearing dates: 15, 16 July 2020 Date of orders: 14 August 2020 Decision date: 14 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Henry J Decision: Interlocutory relief granted. See paragraph [207]. Catchwords: EQUITY – Interlocutory relief – where plaintiffs seeks to restrain defendants from asserting an ownership interest or licence to use patents and communicate with patent authorities – where conflicting evidence as to the existence of a licence to use patents – whether plaintiff has established a serious question to be tried that website posts conveyed licence representations that were misleading or deceptive – whether balance of convenience favours the grant of an injunction – interlocutory restraints granted CIVIL PROCEDURE – Hearings – Suppression and non-publication order – where plaintiffs sought suppression order over letters exhibited to an affidavit – whether suppression order necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – suppression order granted in part Legislation Cited: Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), ss 6, 8(1)(a), 12 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42, 42.7 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Baller Industries Pty Ltd v Mero Mero Leasing Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1067 Castlemaine Tooheys Limited v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148; [1986] HCA 58 Charter Pacific Corporation Ltd v Securicom (NSW) Pty Ltd (No 2) (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 4 September 2018, unrep) Charter Pacific Corporation Ltd v Securicom (NSW) Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1246 Commodore Business Machines Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 92 ALR 563 Devereaux Holdings Pty Ltd v Pelsart Resources NL (No 2) (Supreme Court (NSW), 24 July 1985, unrep) DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2020] NSWCA 136 His Eminence Metropolitan Petar, Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia and New Zealand v The Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 142 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21 Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216; [1978] HCA 11 In the matter of Blue Sennar Air Pty Limited (in liq) [2016] NSWSC 772 John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd v Local Court of New South Wales (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Rinehart v Welker (2011) 93 NSWLR 311; [2011] NSWCA 403 Robin Pty Limited v Canberra International Airport Pty Limited (1999) 179 ALR 449; [1999] FCA 1019 Shercliff v Engadine Acceptance Corporation Pty Ltd [1978] 1 NSWLR 729 Welker v Rinehart [2011] NSWSC 1094 Wilson v Basson [2020] NSWSC 512 Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1069 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Charter Pacific Corporation Ltd (First Plaintiff) CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate