NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Larapinta Project Pty Ltd v Acumen Finance Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1078 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 17 August 2020 Decision date: 17 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Costs reserved. Catchwords: COSTS – application for removal of caveats lodged by defendant – caveats claim a charge pursuant to finance broking agreements – agreement reached for caveats to be removed in exchange for the provision of alternative security – no longer a need for plaintiffs to pursue relief claimed in the Summons – defendant commences fee recovery proceedings against plaintiffs in County Court of Victoria – decision of the County Court likely to be important on question of costs – question of costs to be deferred until after the conclusion of the County Court proceedings Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74MA Cases Cited: Bayblu Holdings Pty Ltd v Capital Finance Australia Ltd (2011) 15 BPR 29,055 Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd v Roberts (2016) 93 NSWLR 1; [2016] NSWCA 240 Category: Costs Parties: Larapinta Projects Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) 132 West Dapto Group Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Acumen Finance Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S V Palmer (Plaintiffs) A Smorchevsky (Defendant)
Solicitors: Bransgroves Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Jackson & Associates (Defendant) File Number(s): 2020/162886 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate