NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: SB v R [2020] NSWCCA 207 Hearing dates: 17 June 2020 Date of orders: 19 August 2020 Decision date: 19 August 2020 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Rothman J at [2]; Hamill J at [178] Decision: (1) Time to file the appeal extended to allow for the filing of the appeal in these proceedings on 28 February 2020; (2) Leave granted under Rule 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules to argue each of Grounds 1 and 2 of the appeal; (3) Leave to appeal granted; (4) The appeal on Ground 2 dismissed; (5) The appeal on Ground 1 allowed; (6) The conviction of the appellant on Counts 1 and 5, being sexual intercourse with a child under 10 years, under authority committed between 16 May 2013 and 10 September 2013 and sexual intercourse with a child under 10 years, committed between 30 October 2015 and 2 November 2015, is quashed; (7) The indictment and/or charges relating to Counts 1, 2, 5 and 6 of the indictment are remitted to the District Court for re-trial. (8) The matter is to be listed in the District Court Arraignment List on 28 August 2020 at 9:30 AM. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – unfair or unbalanced summing-up causing miscarriage of justice – while there may be circumstances that permits a trial judge not to summarise facts, once a judge commences a summary it must be fair and balanced Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), r 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 161, 294 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 59, 60, 66, 102, 135, 136, 137, 164 Cases Cited: DV v R [2017] NSWCCA 276 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606; [1998] HCA 61 McKell v The Queen (2019) 264 CLR 307; [2019] HCA 5 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 R v Chai (2002) 76 ALJR 628; [2002] HCA 12 R v Courtney-Smith (No 2) (1990) 48 A Crim R 49 R v Holden (1917) 34 WN (NSW) 78 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Osborne [1905] 1 KB 551 R v Skuse (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 24 October 1996, unrep) Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510; [1974] HCA 35 Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Weissensteiner v R (1993) 178 CLR 217; [1993] HCA 65 Texts Cited: H Moore, Australian Concise Oxford Dictionary, (4th ed, 2003, Oxford University Press Australia) Judicial Commission of NSW, Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book Category: Principal judgment Parties: SB (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stratton SC (Appellant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate