NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Penrith City Council v Dincel Construction System Pty Limited (No 3) [2020] NSWLEC 117 Hearing dates: 14 August 2020 Date of orders: 18 August 2020 Decision date: 18 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [19] Catchwords: EVIDENCE — Course of evidence — Reopening case — Application to rely upon further updating evidence — Leave granted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 57, 58 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 2.1, 29.5 Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2006] NSWSC 826; (2006) 235 ALR 587 Goodman Fielder Consumer Foods Pty Ltd v Graincorp Foods Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 706 Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22 Penrith City Council v Dincel Construction System Pty Limited and Gaonor Pty Limited [2019] NSWLEC 197 Penrith City Council v Dincel Construction System Pty Limited (No 2) [2020] NSWLEC 58 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256; [1992] HCA 36 Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd (2012) 46 VR 1; [2012] VSCA 232 Urban Transport Authority of New South Wales v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Penrith City Council (Applicant) Dincel Construction System Pty Limited (First Respondent) Gaonor Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R White (Applicant) H Grace (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate