NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 7) [2020] NSWSC 1086 Hearing dates: 6 August 2020 Date of orders: 18 August 2020 Decision date: 18 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: The evidence in paragraphs [59] and [61] of the statement of Xiao Lei Yang dated 30 August 2018 is inadmissible. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - statements made to witness - statements suggest knowledge of relevant events - whether hearsay - whether admissions - whether relevant to prove state of knowledge at earlier time - probative value slight - danger of unfair prejudice Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 56, 60, 81, 82, 88, 137 Cases Cited: The Queen v Dickman (2017) 261 CLR 601; [2017] HCA 24 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP (Crown) TS Law Firm (Al Batat) Voros Lawyers (Luo) Zahr & Partners (Fan) George Sten & Co (Liu) Ross Hill Lawyers (Bayliss) Younes & Espiner (Li) File Number(s): 2018/242293; 2018/214586 (Al Batat) 2017/170943; 2018/380808 (Luo) 2017/168582 (Fan) 2017/168476 (Liu) 2017/321618 (Bayliss) 2018/214894 (Li) Publication restriction: Not to be published until the conclusion of the trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate