NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Keynes Capital Global Limited v Guo [2020] NSWCA 178 Hearing dates: 17 August 2020 Date of orders: 18 August 2020 Decision date: 18 August 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Meagher JA at [27]; Payne JA at [28] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: APPEAL – Practice and procedure – freezing orders – discovery – whether primary judge erred in ordering discovery of documents in context of a challenge to freezing order originally made in aid of proceedings to be commenced in Hong Kong – where proceedings subsequently commenced in Hong Kong – where freezing order extended by consent but subsequent application to vacate freezing order – whether any error of principle in ordering discovery. CIVIL PROCEDURE – Application for leave to appeal – where grant of leave would lack utility – where primary judge did not err in discretionary decision relating to question of practice and procedure – where no issue of error or principle. CIVIL PROCEDURE – Freezing orders – whether discovery appropriately ordered in context of challenge to freezing orders originally obtained ex parte but subsequently extended by consent. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 25.14(3) Cases Cited: Davis v Turning Properties Pty Ltd (2005) 222 ALR 676; [2005] NSWSC 742 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 PA Putney Finance Pty Limited v Aalders [2020] NSWSC 305 PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd (2015) 258 CLR 1; [2015] HCA 36 Resort Hotels Management Pty Ltd v Resort Hotels of Australia Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 730 Severstal Export GmbH v Bhushan Steel Ltd (2013) 84 NSWLR 141; [2013] NSWCA 102 Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Yue'e Zhao (Ruling No 2) [2018] VSC 144 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Keynes Capital Global Limited (First Applicant) General Energy International Holdings Limited (Second Applicant) Hui Guo (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P D Crutchfield QC, E Bathurst (Applicants) E A J Hyde (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate