NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Les & Zelda Investments Pty Ltd v Whitehaven Coal Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1091 Hearing dates: 30 and 31 July 2020 Date of orders: 5 August 2020 Decision date: 05 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: [101] Catchwords: COSTS – security for costs – assessment of quantum – where security provided in tranches – method of assessment – shareholder class action – litigation funder – whether discount from estimated party-party costs appropriate Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 101(4) Companies Act 1862, 25 & 26 Vict, c 89, s 69 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), pt 19.01 High Court Procedure Act 1903 (Cth), s 35(2) Rules of Supreme Court, 1875 Rules of Supreme Court, 1883 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.21, 51.50 Cases Cited: Aberdare & Plymouth Co v Hankey (No 2) (1888) 32 SJ 644 Australia Worldwide Pty Ltd v AW Exports Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1632 Brundza v Robbie & Co (No 2) (1952) 88 CLR 171 Dominion Brewery Ltd v Foster (1898) 77 LT 507 Farmitalia Carlo Erba SrL v Delat West Pty Ltd (1994) 28 IPR 336 Foss Export Agency Pty Ltd v Trotman (1949) 67 WN (NSW) 1 Imperial Bank of China, India, and Japan v Bank of Hindustan, China and Japan (1866) LR 1 Ch App 437 Kupang Resources Ltd v Elias [2018] NSWSC 1553 Mundi v Hesse [2018] NSWSC 1548 Norcast S.árL v Bradken Limited [2012] FCA 765 Pioneer Park Pty Ltd v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2007] NSWCA 344 Procon (GB) Ltd v Provincial Building Co Ltd [1984] 2 All ER 368 Sunday Times Newspaper Company Ltd v McIntosh (1933) SR (NSW) 371 Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 563 Voxson Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (No 8) [2017] FCA 1427 Texts Cited: Commercial List and Technology and Construction List (Practice Note SC Eq 3), paragraph 57 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Whitehaven Coal Limited (Applicant/Defendant) Les & Zelda Investments Pty Ltd (Respondent/Plaintiff) Representation: Counsel: S Doyle QC/I Ahmed (Applicant/Defendant) DR Pritchard SC (Respondent/Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate