NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lord v R [2020] NSWCCA 208 Hearing dates: 22 July 2020 Date of orders: 24 August 2020 Decision date: 24 August 2020 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Garling J at [2] Wright J at [68] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence —Applicant drove wife into river in a fit of rage and then attempted to rescue her – Applicant pleaded guilty to manslaughter - whether significance of rescue was diminished as a mitigating factor – no issue of principle CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Manifest excess – whether sentence was manifestly excessive in the circumstances – ground of appeal dismissed – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edward Kenneth Lord (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S J Odgers SC (Applicant) F Veltro / C Curtis (Respondent)
Solicitors: R Hill (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/62100 Publication restriction: Not Applicable Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Citation: R v Lord [2020] NSWSC 82 Date of Decision: 21 February 2020 Before: Harrison J File Number(s): 2017/62100
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate