NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mentink v Olsen [2020] NSWCA 182 Hearing dates: 4 May 2020 Date of orders: 21 August 2020 Decision date: 21 August 2020 Before: Meagher and Payne JJA at [1]; Emmett AJA at [47] Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: EQUITY — Unconscionable conduct — Special disadvantage — Whether unconscientious advantage taken — Whether gift fair, just and reasonable — Undue influence — Whether findings of primary judge supported by available evidence Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 7.6, 7.11 Cases Cited: Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362; [1956] HCA 81 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457; [1998] HCA 66 Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447; [1983] HCA 14 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392; [2013] HCA 25 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 263 CLR 85; [2017] HCA 49 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Karen Howard Mentink (Appellant) John Henry Olsen (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R D Wilson SC with S Chapple (Appellant) M T McCulloch SC with J E Brown (Respondent)
Solicitors: Bedson Legal (Appellant) Oxley Law (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/335449 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Equity – Expedition List Citation: [2019] NSWSC 1299 Date of Decision: 25 October 2019 Before: Sackar J File Number(s): 2019/118366
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate