NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Al Batat & Ors (No 9) [2020] NSWSC 1101 Hearing dates: 6 August 2020 Date of orders: 21 August 2020 Decision date: 21 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Evidentiary rulings made – see paragraph [61] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - admissions made with authority - co-conspirators rule - common purpose to murder - where one offender makes admissions to a witness criminal concerned in events - whether admissible against co-accused - hearsay - admissions - whether statements made in furtherance of common purpose - scope of common purpose - whether extends to common purpose to avoid detection Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 59, 81, 82, 87 Cases Cited: Ahern v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 87; [1988] HCA 39 Higgins v R [2020] NSWCCA 149 Landini v New South Wales [2007] NSWSC 259 R v Dolding (2018) 100 NSWLR 314; [2018] NSWCCA 127 R v Macraild (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 18 December 1997, unrep) R v Scott Alan May (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 595 Tripodi v The Queen (1961) 104 CLR 1; [1961] HCA 22 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Abdallah Hassan Al Batat Ying Cheng Luo Ian Fan Jaiyu Liu Jacob Blake Bayliss Nai An Li Representation: Counsel: P Hogan (Crown) B Rigg SC (Al Batat) R Webb (Luo) T Quilter (Fan) N Carroll (Liu) A Norrie (Bayliss) D Carroll (Li)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate