NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hamzy v NSW Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCA 184 Hearing dates: 6 August 2020 Date of orders: 20 August 2020 Decision date: 20 August 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Emmett AJA at [51] Decision: 1. Application for leave to appeal refused with costs. 2. Direct the Registrar to forward a copy of this judgment to Bassam Hamzy, High Risk Management Correctional Centre, Maud Street, Goulburn NSW 2580. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – leave to appeal – where refusal to grant adjournment in order to allow prisoner to review potentially privileged communications – where court orders for filing of submissions and evidence breached – where judge given impression that submissions in support of claim for privilege well advanced but submissions were never filed – where judge may have assumed that prisoner had reviewed materials – where this assumption was apparently incorrect and prisoner had filed material to this effect – where potentially privileged material had entered public domain as a result of dismissal of application following refusal of adjournment – where no utility in granting leave in light of this matter. CIVIL PROCEDURE – refusal to recuse for alleged bias – no issue or error of principle. LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – where potentially privileged documents enter the public domain as a result or following refusal of adjournment application and dismissal of claim – no utility in a grant of leave to appeal. Legislation Cited: Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 (NSW) s 57 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 2.1 Cases Cited: Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52; [1983] HCA 39 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Donoghue (2015) 237 FCR 316; [2015] FCAFC 183 Glencore International AG v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (2019) 265 CLR 646; [2019] HCA 26 Jaycar Pty Limited v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 The Age Company Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bassam Hamzy (Applicant) NSW Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate