NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lawrence v Ciantar (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 186 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 21 August 2020 Decision date: 21 August 2020 Before: Bathurst CJ; Meagher JA; Gleeson JA Decision: (1) Dismiss the notice of motion filed 26 May 2020. (2) Applicant to pay the respondents' costs of the motion. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Court of Appeal – application to re-open decision of the Court – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.16 – the slip rule – procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), Pt 7 Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015, r 27 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.16, 36.17 Cases Cited: Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Cabassi v Vila (1940) 64 CLR 130; [1940] HCA 41 Expo Aluminium (NSW) Pty Ltd v Pateman Pty Ltd (No 2) [1991] NSWCA 92 Lawrence v Ciantar [2020] NSWCA 89 McDonald v McDonald (1965) 113 CLR 529; [1965] HCA 45 Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd v City of Sydney (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 240 Waterhouse v Independent Commission Against Corruption (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 362 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wayne James Lawrence (Applicant) Paul William Ciantar (First Respondent) Alice Sammut (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate