Price v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2020] NSWCATOD 93

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Price v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2020] NSWCATOD 93 Hearing dates: 3, 7 August 2020 Date of orders: 21 August 2020 Decision date: 21 August 2020 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A Scahill, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative review – licensing – whether Applicant meets requirements for Issue of builders licence - application of Instrument as policy – experience requirements not met – not unfair or unjust to apply policy Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Evidence Act 1995 Home Building Act 1989 Cases Cited: Grewal v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATOD 101 Limberis v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATOD 128 Locking v Department of Finance and Services [2013] NSWADT 239 Sharman v Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Finance, Services and Innovation [2020] NSWCATOD 26 Shoobridge v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATOD 42 Trengrove v Commissioner for NSW Fair Trading, Department of Finance and Services [2015] NSWCATOD 131 Whitehouse v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATOD 108 Zada v Director General Department of Finances and Services, NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATOD 16 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven Price (Applicant) Commissioner of Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr Coss (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00127812 Publication restriction: Nil